Saturday, March 5, 2011

Car Reviws

Car Reviws


2011 Ford Fusion Hybrid, an AW Drivers Log:

Posted: 04 Mar 2011 07:13 AM PST

AUTOWEEK.COM EDITOR DALE JEWETT: This car is the “stealth” hybrid. Other than the badges on the sides and on the trunk, most people would not be able to tell the hybrid Fusion apart from its conventional-powertrain counterpart.

Years of refinement have turned the Fusion's interior into a solid, comfortable compartment. The switchgear has a tight feel and a high-quality click when operated. The doors open with a solid pop--no tinny sound here.

The leather-covered seats were comfortable and easy to adjust. Seat heaters were welcome over a frigid weekend, but I would wish that they would come on stronger and faster and stay that way, as opposed to the slow warm-up operation I felt.

Again, if you didn't know that this was a hybrid, it would be tough to guess. The transition between the electric motor and the four-cylinder engine is as seamless as I think you could get.

The biggest clue is the lack of engine noise when you first turn the key. In most cases, the Fusion hybrid starts up on battery alone, then the engine kicks in about 10 seconds afterward if it's needed to recharge the battery pack.

Of course, every time I'm in a hybrid, I can't resist the urge to try and travel on battery power alone for as long as possible. In this car, going EV from a stop takes a fairly light touch on the accelerator pedal. But it's much easier to get up to speed with the four-cylinder engine, back off the pedal to begin coasting and switch into EV model, then use the battery to maintain momentum.

The gauge cluster puts a speedometer in the center, flanked by two digital screens. You can chose among a half-dozen designs--from one that closely tracks the workings of the powertrain to a minimal interface that serves up speed, fuel and temperature. And the older-generation interface for the audio/navigation/info system is easy to operate.

This Fusion hybrid is fully loaded, and the sticker shows it. Yet given the technology, it didn't feel as if I was being gouged. If a comfortable ride is your goal, and you spend a good amount of time in stop-and-go traffic, this car will let you blend right in.

2011 Ford Fusion Hybrid

Base Price: $28,825

As-Tested Price: $32,820

Drivetrain: 2.5-liter I4 hybrid; FWD, continuously variable transmission

Output: 156 hp @ 6,000 rpm (191 net system hp), 136 lb-ft @ 2,250 rpm

Curb Weight: 3,720 lb

Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 39/30.2 mpg

Options: Rapid spec 502A including voice-activated navigation system, driver's vision group, BLIS with cross-traffic alert, rearview video camera, rain-sensing wipers, moon &tune value package, power moonroof, Sony 12-speaker sound system, heated front seats ($5,370); rapid spec savings (-$1,375)

Friday, March 4, 2011

Car Reviws

Car Reviws


2011 Chevy Cruze Eco, an AW Drivers Log:

Posted: 03 Mar 2011 07:58 AM PST

EXECUTIVE EDITOR--AUTOWEEK.COM BOB GRITZINGER: It's nice to fill a car from below half a tank and have the pump stop at less than 10 gallons--especially as fuel costs creep steadily upward. The Cruze Eco does that without draining your pocketbook on the other end when it comes to buying the car in the first place. And it does it without gutting the interior of options and niceties, or dumbing down the drivetrain and chassis.

Though it's a cloth interior, the leather steering wheel and shifter trims make it feel more upscale, while the overall materials and layout feel upscale for what is really a relatively budget car. Drive quality is good as well, with most of the road noise and bumps well insulated. I also find the powertrain surprisingly strong for a wee 1.4-liter four-cylinder. Thanks go to the turbo, which really punches up the power, even if it comes with a little lag. There's also some delay in engine decel on throttle lift--not continued acceleration or anything out of control, mind you, just a tendency to wind down a little slower from high revs.

Speaking of revs, this little engine loves to spin up around redline, almost like a Honda four-cylinder. There's some whine, but it's not too annoying and nothing like the raspy fours in General Motors' past. Finally, this engine hooked up to the six-speed automatic not only provides good fuel economy at a reasonable price but is also quite refined and instantly accessible via the slap-stick shifter.

Based on drive quality, interior appointments, powertrain and the Eco package add-ons such as the power-closing aerodynamic "shutter" on the front grille, I really expected this car to sticker in the mid-$20,000 range or higher. This is a bargain for anyone shopping more expensive, high-mpg hybrids or diesels.

NEWS EDITOR GREG MIGLIORE: This is a pretty darn good little car that's suitable for most of the occasions of everyday life. It's decent-looking, has a nice interior, generally sips fuel yet still has a hint of punch from the turbo and is a significant step forward for Chevrolet.

I remember driving a Cobalt fuel-saving edition--with roll-up windows and a stick shift a few years back--and it wasn't exactly overwhelming; you were aware you were skimping to save fuel. But this Cruze is a well-done car that happens to be small. In no way did I ever feel like I was traveling in economy class in this Chevy. The interior has lots of nice parts that look and feel impressive. There's attention to detail here, especially in the trim, the steering wheel and the shifter. I detected a bit of road and engine noise, but nothing too intrusive.

Outside it was more of the same--simple, nicely styled and with attention to the little things. I was surprised when upon clicking the key fob, the taillights illuminated with the flair and distinction; Chevys have had great taillights over the years, and while no one will confuse this with a '61 Impala, it's not a '94 Cavalier, either. Up front is a little plain, but that seems to work in tidy fashion for Honda and Toyota.

I didn't realize right away that this had a turbo. It's a really smart combination of small displacement with a pinch of power. Yes, it's 138 hp, but the curb weight isn't too flabby, and really, it's a small sedan. Isn't this what the government has been wanting General Motors to make for years? There's a little turbo lag, and there was one time I found it necessary to floor it to merge safely ahead of oncoming traffic. But I also was able to slingshot through a crowded service drive and launch onto an expressway at full bore--that was pretty fun. The transmission is pretty adept, though at times I detected some kind of hesitation. The chassis is well-done and handles most roads, no problem. The body is taut and composed through turns, and there's nothing about this car that drives low-budget.

Overall, I was extremely impressed with this sample of the Cruze. People have harped on GM for years about building "cars people want to buy." They'll want to buy this one--it's competitive with anything I've driven in this class in recent memory.

My one real criticism: The fuel economy didn't quite measure up for me, as I notched 25.5 mpg before filling up. Good, not great. Part of that could be attributed to the snowy conditions--which it should be noted this Chevy was more than up for the task. My guess is with a consistent driver (not a stacked lineup of AW hotshoes) and a consistent route, the Cruze will get closer to its touted mpg prowess.

EDITOR WES RAYNAL: This car will become more important as fuel prices rise. The higher they go, the more of these models Chevy will sell, I predict.

It's not a bad little driver, either, and the price is good. An econobox that is fun(ish) to drive is rare. This is one of them. Chevy took weight out of the car (it's roughly 200 pounds lighter than a regular Cruze) and it drives light on its feet and doesn't seem noisier because of less sound deadening. The exterior looks good, interior quality is high in the price range and fit and finish are nice. The car could use better seats; I found these uncomfortable, and the ride is just a little crashy over potholes, but it's pothole season and many cars have a hard time.

There's good power and smooth shifts from the six-speed automatic gearbox. This is one of those cars I liked better than I thought I would, and I believe this would make for a cool hatchback.

COPY EDITOR CYNTHIA L. OROSCO-WRIGHT: I am happy to see this Cruze showing up not only in commercials all over, but also on the streets. I was equally happy to have a few nights in this car. I think Chevy did good job with this car. It's small, yes, but I don't think you lose out any in the way of quality and creature comforts or space. I didn't realize this has a turbo, so that explains the lag I experienced off the line and in getting up to freeway speeds. A bit annoying, but once you are up to speed, on interstates and on neighborhood streets, there's plenty of power to move the Cruze.

The interior presents well, and while the sheetmetal doesn't scream, "Look at me!" it looks nice. The gray paint doesn't do it any favors, though. The car looks much better in the red it was wearing on a non-Eco Cruze that was in the fleet a couple of weeks ago.

I also had this Cruze when the area was hit by the mini blizzard last week, and I did slide a couple of times. But the streets were completely snow-covered and snow-packed, and in my area, we got about a straight hour of freezing rain overnight on top of that, so I blame the wintry mess for the slippage. Whether driving in the mess the day after the blizzard or in blowing snow this morning, the Cruze felt planted and solid. The wind didn't shake it, and there wasn't much wind or road noise that penetrated the cabin. The Cruze is a bit upset by all the potholes, but just about every car is this time of the year. The car warms up fast, and the sound system makes the wintry drive a bit less blah. I would like to be able to adjust the driver's seat down more, and the seats in general could have some more bolster. But I still say this car is a good package.

But, being that this is an "Eco" Cruze, I was expecting a bit better fuel economy.

ASSISTANT ART DIRECTOR/DESIGNER TARA KLEIN: It's simple--this is a nice car. From the sharp, crisp exterior lines to the quality interior and handling, the Cruze shined. This shine wasn't in a flashy manner either; it's classy, and economically classy at that.

The Cruze feels high-end all around, and considering the utilization of more cost-effective materials inside, this is a huge success. The controls were neatly arranged and easy to use along the angular design of the center stack.

My commute was pretty smooth in the Cruze. It handled well, but the aforementioned slight lag was a bit annoying at times. Yes, the bumps were defined, but I agree with the others, with Michigan's recent snow melt, the potholes are bigger and deeper than ever.

This is a compact car, and it felt like it. I had plenty of space up front, but any passengers in the back seat would be feeling a bit scrunched. I could see this being an annoyance for larger groups of people or families, but since I wasn't back there, it was out of sight, out of mind. I just enjoyed my drive home.

2011 Chevrolet Cruze Eco

Base Price: $18,895

As-Tested Price: $20,445

Drivetrain: 1.4-liter turbocharged I4; FWD, six-speed automatic

Output: 138 hp @ 4,900 rpm, 148 lb-ft @ 1,850 rpm

Curb Weight: 3,155 lb

Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 30/28.2 mpg

Options: Six-speed automatic transmission ($925); connectvity plus cruise package including cruise control, USB audio interface, leather-wrapped steering wheel, Bluetooth for phone, leather-trimmed shift lever and steering-wheel controls ($525); compact spare tire replaces tire sealant and inflator kit ($100)

2011 BMW 525d Touring, an AW Flash Drive:

Posted: 03 Mar 2011 08:01 AM PST

a rear view of the BMW 525d Touring wagon.
The joys of the diesel-powered BMW 5-series Touring wagon are kept from American drivers, at least for now.

What is it?

The BMW 525d Touring is about as German as it gets. That means a torquey, diesel-powered station wagon. Our tester was equipped with rear-wheel drive and an eight-speed automatic transmission. Power is rated at 204 hp and an impressive 332 lb-ft of torque, which enables a sprint to 62 mph in 7.3 seconds from the turbo inline six-cylinder engine. That's not bad--this is a big car. The inside is typical 5-series, with nice materials, soft surfaces and understated design.

What is it like to drive?

It's a big, strong runner that gracefully builds speed and is reasonable in regards to fuel efficiency. The engine redlines at just over 4,000 rpm, and enthusiasts will enjoy the maximum toque as soon as 1,750 rpm. Acceleration is more than adept for a large wagon, and it reaches and holds top speeds with ease. Blasting across the autobahn at triple-digit speeds was energetic--and this 5-series holds it together well. The cabin remains isolated and the body composed. Lesser cars begin to get loud and unglued at much lower speeds. Regardless of how fast you're going, the interior is a quiet setting, easy for carrying on conversations and relaxing during extended periods of cruising.

The chassis is compliant but not excessively soft, and the brakes are proficient, biting quickly with little pedal travel. The steering offers nice response through maneuvers.

Punch up sport mode and the driving experience tightens; sport plus takes it slightly farther. Both are fun. On mountain roads with twists and curves, this big wagon feels surprisingly at home. Sure, a 3-series would carve corners better, but this wagon is no slouch. Even when jerking the wheel during steering, the tail doesn't wag much, and it takes a heavy foot to spin the tires.

Do I want it?

Doesn't matter--this is a Europe-only car. BMW doesn't sell the 5-series with a diesel engine or in wagon guise in the United States (we get the 5-series GT instead). But it does in other places. And the German carmaker historically considers diesel a spotlight technology. Wagons are functional--this one had a huge cargo hold and a decent back seat--and offers a much sportier driving experience than taller, boxier SUVs. It's posh, reasonably fun to drive and functional. If it were sold here, some Americans would definitely like the 525d.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Car Reviws

Car Reviws


2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK250, an AW Flash Drive:

Posted: 02 Mar 2011 09:05 AM PST

the 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK250.
The turbocharged four-cylinder engine in the 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK250 is rated at 201 hp.

What is it?

Mercedes-Benz is promising quite a lot with its new SLK, the third iteration of the company's two-seat hardtop convertible roadster, suggesting it represents a much bigger evolutionary step and possesses greater sporting flair than its predecessor.

Wearing a nose treatment similar to that on the SLS, there is timeless elegance and a more muscular look compared with that of the old model. Inside, the car feels roomier, thanks to an extra 1.3 inches of width. The interior also picks up many of the aeronautical cues present in the SLS. One cool option is a new variable-tint glass roof. Called Magic Sky Control, the roof uses an electrically charged condenser element to vary the tint of the glass.

Three models will come to the United States:

-- The SLK350 running the German carmaker's new naturally aspirated 3.5-liter, direct-injection V6 with 302 hp and 273 lb-ft of torque arrives in June.

-- The SLK250 with a 201-hp, 229-lb-ft turbocharged 1.8-liter four-cylinder arrives in February 2012.

-- Finally, we expect there will be a successor to the SLK55 AMG, which will get a 422-hp naturally aspirated version of AMG's new 5.5-liter V8.

What is it like to drive?

We're testing the SLK250 first because it is new to the lineup and is expected to account for a large percentage of U.S. sales.

The blown four-cylinder, known internally as the M271, is well suited to the new Mercedes-Benz roadster, providing gutsy performance across a wide range of revs. Our test car was equipped with a seven-speed automatic transmission (a six-speed manual gearbox will be available on the 250). So equipped, the SLK250 hits 60 mph in 6.5 seconds.

Even with considerable attention to the chassis and torque apportioning across the rear-wheel drive, the new SLK still doesn't deliver a leap in sportiness. At the same time, it is quite accomplished--especially at high speed--and is nicely balanced, it possesses good body control, resists understeer and provides excellent ride quality.

Do I want one?

There are more overtly sporting roadsters to choose from, but few of them can claim to match the new SLK's impressive breadth of abilities. It is a more accomplished car than its predecessor in many ways. If the idea of a junior SL takes your fancy, you're going to like the new SLK a lot. For that is, in essence, what Mercedes-Benz has succeeded in creating.

2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK250

On Sale: June

Price: N/A

Drivetrain: 1.8-liter, 201-hp, 229-lb-ft turbocharged I4; RWD, seven-speed automatic

Curb weight: 3,307 lb

0-60 MPH: 6.5 sec

Fuel Economy: 38 mpg (European cycle)

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Car Reviws

Car Reviws


The 2011 Honda Accord EX-L Sedan, an AW Drivers Log:

Posted: 01 Mar 2011 09:08 AM PST

EXECUTIVE EDITOR ROGER HART: This car is spectacular in its unspectacularness. And maybe that's not fair. But this car is just so competent in being exactly what it's meant to be: a terrific all-around car, and it does it without a lot of fanfare. It does not wow in its exterior styling, nor does it swaddle you with a luxurious interior. But, it's a handsome car and the interior is comfortable, efficient and quiet, with a decent sound system. The center stack is dominated by the now dated-looking deep-set nav screen and multiple-button control panel for the nav/entertainment/HVAC controls. But again, it all works well.

There is a minor hesitation in the V6 when the car goes into its Eco cycle. And the only reason to mention it is because it was noticeable. With most of the systems that shut off cylinders in other cars and trucks, it happens so effortlessly as to not be noticeable. The V6 is plenty potent to haul this car around, and the five-speed shifts smoothly and quickly. The fuel gauge barely moved on my lengthy commute.

The Accord remains at the top of the list of midsize (full-size?) sedans. It's a big, thick chunk of white bread in an ever-increasing multigrain market. But it's as good a white bread as you're going to get, and lots of people love white bread. There's nothing wrong with that.

MOTORSPORTS EDITOR MAC MORRISON: Spot on, Hart. I had not driven an Accord in quite some time, and I chuckled as I realized that I kept thinking, "Wow, what a supremely solid, supremely boring car."

That's been the Accord sedan's appeal yet weak point for ages. It's simply just a finely engineered real-world workhorse that goes about its business in cool efficiency. For the masses who just want to know that their car is going to fire up and get them to wherever they need to go in quiet cruising comfort, it's hard to argue against it.

I prefer the coupe, however, as that version at least injects a bit more style and life into this time-proven Honda formula. The sedan is reasonably attractive, but nothing about it wows you or makes you stop and take a second or third glance. The same goes for the interior, which is put together well and ergonomically appealing yet tried-and-true and again, boring, at the same time. The radio/nav display and controls do now look and feel dated, as Roger noted.

NEWS EDITOR GREG MIGLIORE: It's interesting every time a new midsize sedan hits the market, we all drool over it if it's even sort of respectable. Thing is, Honda's already there with the Accord. It's been solid for so long we probably take it for granted. There is nothing spectacular about this car, and it's stout in almost every way. The worst thing you can say about it is other, newer models are considerably flashier than the Accord. The interior, especially, looks dated and drab--even though it's comfortable and nonoffensive.

The engine and the five-speed automatic are a smart pairing, with plenty of power and revs channeled effectively. Merging onto the expressway is little trouble, and I summoned more than 4,000 rpm to hit 80 mph and smoothly join traffic. The tranny shifts dutifully, and there's a confidence to this car. The 271-hp output is downright impressive, in my book, for a Honda Accord.

The chassis is comfortable yet not too soft. There's bearing through turns and the car stays mostly flat through slightly aggressive cornering. Whacking road imperfections isn't mind-numbing or teeth-rattling, so I would say Honda has struck the right blend of tightness and agreeability in the suspension.

The steering is solid and true, with just enough feedback into maneuvers to be satisfying. You can direct this car with the flick of a wrist, or put both hands on the wheel, lock in and try to hit your lines properly. Well done.

The interior is rather plain. It's hard to rail on a car for that, because the quality is quite good. With black leather and nice materials, everything looks and feels fine. But when every other car in the market is trimmed up and down and offers clublike ambient lighting, it's hard not to notice the vanilla effort here.

The outside looks good to me--a stately design with nice cues, though nothing stands out as it does on the Ford Fusion (grille) or the Hyundai Sonata (swoopy lines).

Overall, Honda remains a leader in this segment. And when you drive this car, it's not hard to see why.

ASSOCIATE EDITOR JONATHAN WONG: Yeah, the car is boring, and the exterior and the interior don't excite, but this is a solid car, as everyone else has stated. It's an all-around contender like a mixed martial artist who has good stand-up, wrestling and jiu-jitsu to make him a threat in all areas but rarely finishes a fight in spectacular knockout or submission fashion.

Instead, it grinds out a win by decision, and there's nothing wrong with that, because in this class you have to appeal to a broad range of people, and any loud styling may turn some customers away. People don't buy an Accord based on looks (well, not the sedan anyway), but because it's good at everything and will most likely last forever with proper maintenance. This coming from a member of a family that has two Accords in the stable. One is a 1991 Accord LX with more than 320,000 miles on it, and the other is a 1998 with 240,000 miles on it. So I've had plenty of Accord Kool-Aid.

Greg summed up my thoughts on the drive nicely, so I'll save you from that, but I did ponder a couple of things last night during my stint. The first involves the five-speed automatic transmission, while the Toyota Camry, the Nissan Altima, the Chevrolet Malibu and the Fusion are packing six-speed units. Honda has always been a bit slow in the transmission department. That's not to say that this five-speed is bad because it isn't, and it performs smooth and quick upshifts and downshifts.

Being a cog down, you would think that the Accord would suffer in the fuel-economy department compared with the others, but you would be wrong. The Accord's fuel-economy ratings went up by 1 mpg in both city and highway calculations for 2011, to 20 mpg and 30 mpg respectively. To compare, the Camry V6 has a 20/29 city/highway mpg rating and the Malibu V6 is rated at 17/26 city/highway mpg. Even the Altima with its CVT falls short of the Accord with 20/27 city/highway mpg figures. And the Accord beats all of those with one less gear. Just think what having a six-speed would do.

It's also worth pointing out that the Accord's V6 packs the most horsepower of the group with 271. The Toyota produces 268 hp, the Malibu has 252 hp and the Altima makes 270 hp. All V6s are 3.5-liters in displacement with the exception of the Chevy, which is 3.6 liters. And I'll also say that I find the Honda V6 to be the smoothest and most refined unit of the bunch.

The second thing that got me wondering was how Hyundai's all-four-cylinder powertrain lineup in the Sonata compares. In place of a range-topping V6 is a 2.0-liter turbocharged I4 with 274 hp mated to six-speed automatic, which has a fuel-economy rating of 22/33 city/highway mpg. So the force-induced Hyundai is both more fuel-efficient and more powerful than the Accord V6 and the rest of the V6 midsize-sedan players mentioned previously. And if you're thinking that the Sonata 2.0T has nothing on the low end, think again, because the 269 lb-ft of peak torque is available from 1,750 rpms up to 4,500 rpms. I think Honda and the rest of the competition should find that downright scary.

2011 Honda Accord EX-L Sedan

Base Price: $32,380

As-Tested Price: $32,380

Drivetrain: 3.5-liter V6; FWD, five-speed automatic

Output: 271 hp @ 6,000-6,200 rpm, 254 lb-ft @ 5,000 rpm

Curb Weight: 3,605 lb

Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 24/20.0 mpg

Options: None

Popular Posts

Labels